Hello, I'm Chris Murphy — I specialize in creating engaging, user-centric interactive experiences.

Top 3 Myths of Content Management Systems.

When it comes to choosing a CMS, its a challenge to know where to begin in terms of finding the software that is best suited for your needs -- particular as they may be.

Search Google for the term, “Content Management System”, “CMS” or about any permutation of the concept you might think of, and you’ll get anywhere from 90,000 to 160,000 potential results. If only one percent of those results yield A to B-grade Content Management Systems, that is still a tremendous number of systems to attempt feature comparisons.

The math makes my head hurt already.

If any when you do manage to find a handful of solutions that you feel might answer your particular needs, your challenge will be in settling on one system out of many. How do you decide what stays and what goes?

Here are some of the top three myths that lead people astray:

Myth No. 3 — A CMS is ready “out of the box”.

General Perception:

Content Management Systems provide website administrators with everything they need to launch, manage, and maintain a website with little to no effort.

Reality Check:

Launching a website is never as easy as 1, 2, 3.

The level of effort and resources required to get a CMS up and running corresponds directly to the business requirements of the site, and size/complexity of the CMS.

Forget what was advertized on the box.

If you’re in a position where you’re still thinking about which CMS to go with, consider talking to customers who are actively using the software. Compare notes. Ask specifically about how key features worked for them or more importantly, what didn’t work for them and why.

This is a good opportunity to consider your own requirements for needing a CMS. It’s easy to get lost in all the hype and lose sight of why you needed it in the first place, so put your needs into writing and use your list as a guide post when evaluating features.

Myth No. 2 — Anyone can use a CMS.

General Perception:

“If you can use MS Word, you can use a CMS”.

Reality Check:

Understand that every CMS subscribes to a different philosophy when it comes to working with content. The methodology behind the workflow might make sense for one group and be totally alien to another, which makes it more difficult when you’re attempting to do feature comparisons (ultimately, they all follow a few common strategies).

It comes down to the User Experience.

You cannot legitimately equate the whole experience of using a CMS to something like MS Word. You can legitimately equate a feature of the CMS to MS Word (if it exists).

The User Experience between a system like “Joomla!”, “Magnolia”, or “Drupal” are dramatically different. I won’t get too deep into the how and why of things, but suffice to say that if your comparison between package was based only on side-by-side comparisons of their interfaces, you’d immediately see how different they are from each other.

Consider who will actually be using the CMS. Is it a group of developers or is it a group off general staffers tasked with the responsibility? Think about the end user here; it’s not the site visitor who will be directly affected by the CMS, but the people managing the content.

What kind of interface are they most comfortable using (WYSIWYG, form based, code)? Do any of them have working experience with HTML, CSS or a scripting language?

This is your red flag.

Stop.

Take a step back and look to your content team — get their input.

Myth No. 1 — A CMS should manage everything.

General Perception:

Content Management Systems are designed to manage all of a website’s content and features.

Reality Check:

Content Management Systems come in all flavours, but not one of them handles every facet of a website in an elegant manner (thus the reasons for Myth No. 2, 3).

I’m not quite sure how this myth started, but I’m sure anyone who has had the opportunity to work with a CMS understands this: there is an expectation that a CMS has the ability manage the content of every single asset, feature, function, or concept in a given website.

This is so – dangerously – far from the truth.

Think about it this way: Your CMS does not define your website.

Read that last sentence again. Memorize it for the next time you’re making recommendations to your clients or shopping around for yourself.

A CMS is designed to help you manage content, but unless engineered to be, two websites are never the same beast. Content volume, features, design, strategies can vary wildly, and so it is next to impossible to have a single CMS (out of the box) manage every aspect of a website without running into the need to extend, include plug-ins, or write unique code to support the site’s particular requirements.

Consider that feat the Holy Grail of all CMS.

Be realistic about what you need a CMS to do. Think about the content of your site, and if you haven’t already, consider bringing on a Content Strategist to help you define the Information Architecture.

An important thing you should try to understand is that you don’t need one tool to manage everything – in the real world, you need a toolbox full of the the most reliable, appropriate tools to help you manage your website content.

Things to consider when you do manage to find a suitable CMS.

It’s easy to get misled by the marketing and hype, and technical jargon around a CMS. If you can only remember three things before you start searching, keep the following in mind:

  1. Find a tool that your organization can implement: Speak to your development team/IT to get a realistic scope on what it will take to get up and running.
  2. Realize who will actually use the software: Most importantly, interview your content management group to find out what their expectations (and level of experience) is with a CMS or similar software.
  3. Develop a content strategy: Interview the key stakeholders to find out what the common needs are, and what the business requirements are for the website – don’t engineer your content to fit the limitations of one tool.

Ultimately speaking, a CMS is just one tool for the task of managing the content of your website, and sometimes you need different tools to do the job. There is no doubt that finding the right tool is going to be an easy task – expect a difficult road – but with a little forethought, some planning, and a good understanding of your needs (not wants), choosing a CMS will be less painful in the long run.

farfromfearless

Comments on This Post:

  1. Dainis Grave…
    Date: February 9, 2009
    Time: 4:41 pm

    pretty funny myths :D buut sounds like true..

  2. Gert
    Date: February 9, 2009
    Time: 6:22 pm

    I searched the internet for CMS’s and I played with installing some but I found that their installation are really difficult and giving off errors. I liked Joomla first. But that did not last long as I could not get it to work. One CMS feature that really tickle my fancy is the viral adsense sharing module/add on that is written for Drupal. Since the introduction of so many CMS installations in the Fantastico bundle, it is much easier although I recently installed Drupal and found that I still had to “patch” the installation. It also gave me a recommeded critical security upgrade notice so I just left it at that until the version in Fantastico is updated.

  3. Lerynne
    Date: February 18, 2009
    Time: 1:09 pm

    Thanks for this objective overview of how to choose a CMS that suits the needs it has to meet.

    For people looking to build their own websites, your myth-busters are a very important starting point.

    For people who want to have a website built for them, your point about developing a content strategy is essential! Too often too much focus is on the “look” of the website and not nearly enough thought goes into planning, creating and organizing the content that has to go on it. It doesn’t matter how good/powerful/flexible/adaptable/expandable your website system is – if you don’t know what it’s actual goal is and/or don’t have decent content to move people to take the action you want them to take to achieve your goal, it’s not going to “work.”

    A little planning goes a long way – and your tips should form part of that planning. :)

  4. Chris Murphy
    Date: February 18, 2009
    Time: 1:32 pm

    Hi Lerynne, I appreciate your comments on this article, and I’m glad you found it valuable.
    It’s always a challenge when working with clients to communicate the value of a good content strategy. More often than not, clients tend to approach their website redesigns with a “lipstick on the pig” notion. My whole career over the last year or so has been focused on educating clients about the value and the merits of good planning, and finding ways to help them understand their return on investment. Thanks for reading!

  5. RWolfe
    Date: February 19, 2009
    Time: 2:01 pm

    interesting

  6. Elucid Marke…
    Date: April 16, 2009
    Time: 9:55 pm

    Great Content and separation of myths to facts.

    Join me and my online group of web developers, marketers, and students studying programming. We are at facebook@ elucidmarketing and twitter@elucidmarketing

    elucidmarketing.com

  7. Brockdin Bar…
    Date: April 28, 2009
    Time: 8:37 pm

    Gert,

    If you decide to adopt the flexibility and power of Drupal you’d need to learn how to upgrade anyway. There is a huge learning curve with Drupal and I would suggest taking time to learn and get yourself up to speed. iTunes podcasts are a good and fun place to start.

    Brock

  8. How to Fix Y…
    Date: March 7, 2010
    Time: 11:31 pm

    [...] In recent weeks I’ve been fielding a number of questions from prospective clients and visitors to my site regarding criterion for selecting the right CMS for their website. More often than not, I tend to direct them to an article I wrote previously on this particular subject: Top 3 Myths of Content Management Systems – Feb. 6th, 2009 [...]

Add a Comment:

Comment Guidelines: Basic XHTML is allowed (a href, strong, em, code). All line breaks and paragraphs are automatically generated. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Email addresses will never be published. Keep it PG-13 people!

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

All fields marked with "*" are required.